Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A8-7680
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4810 is positioned at rank 113 and the Radeon R7 A8-7680 is on rank 90, so the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7680
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R7 A8-7680 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4810.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A8-7680 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon R7 A8-7680
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon R7 A8-7680
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 791 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the Radeon R7 A8-7680 reaches 791 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7680).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 791+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1024+28% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4810) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7680) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4810) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7680's 100W — a 62.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 246mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 100W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 246mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 7.9+93% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 79.1 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers 53% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $50-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7 | 79.1+53% |
| Codename | RV790 | Trinidad |
| Release | April 2 2009 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #762 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon R7 A8-7680
