Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4810
2009Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7680 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β40% HIGHER MSRP$70 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- β90% higher power demand at 190W vs 100W.
Radeon R7 A8-7680
2015Why buy it
- β 59.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- β Delivers 42.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- β Draws 100W instead of 190W, a 90W reduction.
- β Measures 1mm instead of 246mm, a 245mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R7 A8-7680
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 791 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the Radeon R7 A8-7680 reaches 791 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7680).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 791+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1024+28% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4810 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7680. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4810) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7680) β the Radeon R7 A8-7680 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4810) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7680's 100W β a 62.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 246mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 100W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 246mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 7.9+93% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4810 came in at $70, while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7680 was 28.6% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 15.8 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) β the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers 42.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7680 (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R7 A8-7680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $50-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 15.8+42% |
| Codename | RV790 | Trinidad |
| Release | April 2 2009 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #762 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















