Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 M270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 M270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 M270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅1.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M270

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M270 instead at 775 vs 773, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19.7% (3.1 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 M270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 scores 773 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score	773	775
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8192 TFLOPS+13%	0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 M270
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	14.1+37%	10.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A10-8850 came in at $250, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A10-8850 was 16.7% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers 19.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8850 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-8850	Radeon R7 M270
MSRP	$250-17%	$300
Performance per Dollar	3.1+19%	2.6
Codename	Cape Verde	Topaz
Release	July 6 2016	June 11 2014
Ranking	#667	#897

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.