Radeon R7 A10-8850
VS
Radeon R7 M270

Radeon R7 A10-8850 vs Radeon R7 M270

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016Core: 800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M270

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 940 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is positioned at rank 288 and the Radeon R7 M270 is on rank 609, so the Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8850

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2348%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2255%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2229%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2225%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2221%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2208%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2180%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2172%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2152%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2146%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2120%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2116%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2078%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2076%
#273
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2589%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
96%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
92%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
87%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
86%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
86%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
85%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
82%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
82%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
80%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
79%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
78%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
77%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270

#599
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4208%
#601
3815%
#602
3805%
#606
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3460%
#607
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3436%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
100%
#611
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
99%
#612
99%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
97%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
97%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
96%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
93%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
92%
#623
91%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-8850.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A10-8850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $250 (vs $300), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 19.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+19.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($250)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-8850 and Radeon R7 M270

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 scores 773 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score
773
775
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8192 TFLOPS+13%
0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
TDP
55W-27%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
14.1+37%
10.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers 19.2% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-8850Radeon R7 M270
MSRP
$250-17%
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$250-17%
$300
Performance per Dollar
3.1+19%
2.6
Codename
Cape Verde
Topaz
Release
July 6 2016
June 11 2014
Ranking
#667
#897