
Radeon R7 A365 vs GeForce GT 740M

Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 740M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A365 is positioned at rank 412 and the GeForce GT 740M is on rank 91, so the GeForce GT 740M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 740M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 740M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A365.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 740M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A365 and GeForce GT 740M

Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

GeForce GT 740M
The GeForce GT 740M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 782 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the GeForce GT 740M reaches 782 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 740M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 384 (GeForce GT 740M). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 781 | 782 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A365 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 740M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 740M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 740M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+10% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 740M). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GT 740M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 740M's 64W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 350W (GeForce GT 740M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-53% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+113% | 12.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















