
Radeon R7 A365

Radeon R7 M270
Radeon R7 A365 vs Radeon R7 M270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 A365 vs Radeon R7 M270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 A365 vs Radeon R7 M270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 177.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 M270
2014Why buy it
- ✅3.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌175.2% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A365 vs Radeon R7 M270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

Radeon R7 M270
The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 940 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 781 | 775 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 0.7219 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 940 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M270). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M270). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon R7 M270).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+152% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 A365 came in at $109, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A365 was 63.7% cheaper ($191 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon R7 A365 offers 176.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-64% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2+177% | 2.6 |
| Codename | Opal | Topaz |
| Release | January 9 2014 | June 11 2014 |
| Ranking | #890 | #897 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















