Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Radeon R7 A365 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Radeon R7 A365

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

Radeon R7 A365 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum

Radeon R7 A365
0.5 GB 30
781
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 7650M
brand logoRadeon R5 330
brand logoRadeon HD 7570
brand logoRadeon HD 6630M
brand logoRadeon 760M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Shared System RAM 15
800
+2.4%
brand logoArc A310
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A365 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A365

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Radeon R7 A365 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (800 vs 781), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A365 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A365 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 A365 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score
781
800+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 12
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384+2300%
16
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1450 MHz+76%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A365 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. Radeon R7 A365 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
DirectX
12 (FL 12_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365) vs Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs Quick Sync 8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Encoder
VCE 3.0
Quick Sync 8
Decoder
UVD 6.0
Quick Sync 8
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
—
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
53.3+105%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A365 came in at $109, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 A365UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
MSRP
$109
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
Infinity
Codename
Opal
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
January 9 2014
March 30 2021
Ranking
#890
#917
Search Radeon R7 A365 on AmazonSearch UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.