Radeon R7 A365 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A365 is positioned at rank #412 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365

#402

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1514%

#404

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1373%

#405

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1369%

#409

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1245%

#410

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1236%

#412

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

100%

#413

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#415

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#416

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

99%

#417

Arc 8-Core iGPU

MSRP: $503|Avg: $400

97%

#418

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

96%

#419

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

96%

#420

Radeon R9 M385

MSRP: $300|Avg: $60

96%

#421

Radeon R5 235

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

96%

#422

Radeon R9 M375X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

95%

#423

Radeon HD 6620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

95%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#425

Radeon HD 7690M XT

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#426

Radeon HD 7600G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

93%

#427

Radeon R7 A265

MSRP: $149|Avg: $149

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A365 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 A365 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 A365 Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A365 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score	781	800+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 12
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	384+2300%	16
Boost Clock	825 MHz	1450 MHz+76%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A365 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 A365 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365) vs Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs Quick Sync 8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Encoder	VCE 3.0	Quick Sync 8
Decoder	UVD 6.0	Quick Sync 8
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon R7 A365	UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP	30W	15W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	26.0	53.3+105%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).