Radeon R7 A365 vs Radeon R7 A8-7600
Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A8-7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A365 is positioned at rank 412 and the Radeon R7 A8-7600 is on rank 191, so the Radeon R7 A8-7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Radeon R7 A8-7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A365 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A365 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7600.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A8-7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $55 for the Radeon R7 A365, it costs 55% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 118.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+118.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A365 and Radeon R7 A8-7600
Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Radeon R7 A8-7600
The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the Radeon R7 A8-7600 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 781 | 775 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+3333% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 2655 MHz+222% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A365) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7600) — the Radeon R7 A8-7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7600's 165W — a 138.5% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-82% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+453% | 4.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 launched at $119 and now averages $25. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 costs 54.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 31.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7600) — the Radeon R7 A8-7600 offers 118.3% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Radeon R7 A8-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-8% | $119 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $25-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.2 | 31.0+118% |
| Codename | Opal | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 9 2014 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #890 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A365 and Radeon R7 A8-7600
