
Radeon R7 A365 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5000

Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A365 is positioned at rank 412 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is on rank 403, so the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A365 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 5000.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $55), it costs 64% less, resulting in a 172.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+172.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A365 and Mobility Radeon HD 5000

Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 5000
The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A365 scores 781 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A365 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5000). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5000).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 781+1% | 773 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+77% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+20% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A365 draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5000's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A365) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+68% | 15.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 costs 63.6% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.2 (Radeon R7 A365) vs 38.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) — the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 offers 171.8% better value. The Radeon R7 A365 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A365 | Mobility Radeon HD 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $99-9% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $20-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.2 | 38.6+172% |
| Codename | Opal | Broadway |
| Release | January 9 2014 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #890 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















