
Radeon R7 M265

Radeon R7E
Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon R7E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon R7E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon R7E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 M265
2014Why buy it
- ✅64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Radeon R7E
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon R7E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M265
The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M265 scores 560 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M265 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 560 | 565 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.894 TFLOPS+131% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M265 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7E carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M265 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265 and 64-bit on the Radeon R7E. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 M265) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7 M265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M265) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M265 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M265) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 55W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 10.3+178% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 M265 came in at $130, while the Radeon R7E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R7E was 100+% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (Radeon R7 M265) vs Infinity (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 13 2014 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #489 | #738 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














