Radeon R7 M265 vs Radeon R7E
Radeon R7 M265
Popular choices:
Radeon R7E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M265 is positioned at rank #249 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M265 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M265 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M265 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $49), it costs 39% less, resulting in a 61.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M265 and Radeon R7E
Radeon R7 M265
The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M265 scores 560 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M265 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 560 | 565 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.894 TFLOPS+131% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M265 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7E has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 M265 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 M265) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7 M265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M265) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M265 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M265) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 55W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 10.3+178% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M265 launched at $130 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R7E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon R7 M265 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.7 (Radeon R7 M265) vs 11.5 (Radeon R7E) — the Radeon R7 M265 offers 62.6% better value. The Radeon R7 M265 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265 | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.7+63% | 11.5 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 13 2014 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #489 | #738 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M265 and Radeon R7E
