Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R7 M265

AMD

Radeon R5 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M265

2014Boost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R7 M265 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R7 M265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R7 M265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Delivers 119.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M265

2014

Why buy it

  • 81.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 120.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $130 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M265 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 81.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (560 vs 558), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $130, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 119.6% (9.5 vs 4.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M265 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R7 M265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Radeon R7 M265

The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 240 scores 558 and the Radeon R7 M265 reaches 560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 240) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240) vs 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
G3D Mark Score
558
560
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1024+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.448 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS+323%
Boost Clock
780 MHz
925 MHz+19%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
64+220%
L1 Cache
80 KB
256 KB+220%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 240 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M265 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon R7 M265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R5 240) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
DirectX
12_0
12 (11_1)
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M265). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M265's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R5 240) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
168mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
18.6+403%
3.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 240 came in at $59, while the Radeon R7 M265 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 54.6% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) vs 4.3 (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 120.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R5 240Radeon R7 M265
MSRP
$59-55%
$130
Performance per Dollar
9.5+121%
4.3
Codename
Oland
Pitcairn
Release
October 8 2013
February 13 2014
Ranking
#911
#489

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.