Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon R7 M270DX
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8690M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M270DX is positioned at rank 372 and the Radeon HD 8690M is on rank 247, so the Radeon HD 8690M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270DX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8690M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8690M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M270DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8690M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon R7 M270DX
The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.
Radeon HD 8690M
The Radeon HD 8690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 984 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M270DX scores 962 and the Radeon HD 8690M reaches 984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M270DX is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8690M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 320 (Radeon HD 8690M). Raw compute: 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8690M). Boost clocks: 940 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 962 | 984+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7219 TFLOPS+37% | 0.528 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz+14% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+20% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 8690M) — the Radeon R7 M270DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M270DX draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8690M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8690M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.8 | 19.7+54% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M270DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | Topaz | Sun |
| Release | June 11 2014 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #897 | #891 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon HD 8690M
