Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M375

AMD

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 940 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M375 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 189.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M375 across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M375

2015

Why buy it

  • 21.3% more average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.3% in average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (998 vs 962), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M270DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M270DX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 189.2% (9.6 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M375 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 M270DX

The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375

The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M270DX scores 962 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M270DX is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375). Boost clocks: 940 MHz vs 1015 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R9 M375
G3D Mark Score
962
998+4%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7219 TFLOPS
1.299 TFLOPS+80%
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1015 MHz+8%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB
160 KB+67%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R9 M375
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M270DX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R9 M375
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M270DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R9 M375
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.8
13.3+4%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M270DX came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M270DX was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 190.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R9 M375
MSRP
$100-67%
$300
Performance per Dollar
9.6+191%
3.3
Codename
Topaz
Tropo
Release
June 11 2014
May 5 2015
Ranking
#897
#889

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.