Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R7 M445

AMD

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 940 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M445

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R7 M445 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R7 M445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R7 M445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014

Why buy it

  • 11.1% more average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 154% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M270DX across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M270DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.1% in average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (962 vs 947), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M270DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M270DX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 154% (9.6 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R7 M445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 M270DX

The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M270DX scores 962 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M270DX is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445). Boost clocks: 940 MHz vs 920 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R7 M445
G3D Mark Score
962+2%
947
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7219 TFLOPS+23%
0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
940 MHz+2%
920 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
96 KB+20%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R7 M445
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R7 M270DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R7 M445
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M270DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R7 M445
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Perf/Watt
12.8
63.1+393%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M270DX came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M445 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M270DX was 60% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 152.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M445 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 M270DXRadeon R7 M445
MSRP
$100-60%
$250
Performance per Dollar
9.6+153%
3.8
Codename
Topaz
Meso
Release
June 11 2014
May 15 2016
Ranking
#897
#899

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.