Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 M270DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 M270DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 M270DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅84.8% more average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
104.1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.8% in average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (1,000 vs 962), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 112.1% (20.4 vs 9.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs Radeon R7 M270DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

Radeon R7 M270DX

The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,000 and the Radeon R7 M270DX reaches 962 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the Radeon R7 M270DX uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX).

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 M270DX
G3D Mark Score	1,000+4%	962
Architecture	GCN	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 M270DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270DX.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 M270DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M270DX's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 M270DX
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	33.3+160%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) came in at $49, while the Radeon R7 M270DX launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 9.6 (Radeon R7 M270DX) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 112.5% better value.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP	$49-51%	$100
Performance per Dollar	20.4+113%	9.6
Codename	Kaveri Spectre	Topaz
Release	January 14 2014	June 11 2014
Ranking	#865	#897

Search Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M270DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.