G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
206.1% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅102.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 203.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 102.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M XT instead at 1,009 vs 1,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7690M XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 203.4% (20.4 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7690M XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7690M XT scores 1,009 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	1,009	1,000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480+25%	384
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7690M XT has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7690M XT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7690M XT and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX	11.2	12_0+7%
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder	UVD 3	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7690M XT draws 25W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP	25W-17%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	1mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	40.4+21%	33.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7690M XT came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 67.3% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 204.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon HD 7690M XT	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP	$150	$49-67%
Performance per Dollar	6.7	20.4+204%
Codename	Thames	Kaveri Spectre
Release	January 7 2013	January 14 2014
Ranking	#883	#865

Search Radeon HD 7690M XT on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.