Radeon HD 7690M XT
VS
Radeon R9 A375

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R9 A375

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 A375

2015Core: 1015 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is positioned at rank 425 and the Radeon R9 A375 is on rank 83, so the Radeon R9 A375 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7690M XT

#415
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1613%
#417
1462%
#418
1459%
#422
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1326%
#423
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1317%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
99%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
99%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#431
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#432
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
96%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
96%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#439
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
347%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
333%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
330%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
329%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
328%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
326%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
322%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
321%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
318%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
317%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
313%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
313%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
307%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
307%
#68
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
383%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
70%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
69%
#83
Radeon R9 A375
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#85
98%
#86
Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
95%
#87
GeForce GT 710
MSRP: $35|Avg: $50
85%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
77%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
76%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
74%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
70%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
68%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 A375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7690M XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7690M XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7690M XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $49), it costs 18% less, resulting in a 20.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+20.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7690M XT and Radeon R9 A375

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7690M XT scores 1,009 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,024+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
640+33%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7690M XT comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7690M XT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
DirectX
11.2
12_0+7%
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
Encoder
UVD 3
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 4.2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7690M XT draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
TDP
25W-17%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
40.4+18%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7690M XT launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Radeon HD 7690M XT costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon HD 7690M XT offers 20.6% better value. The Radeon R9 A375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R9 A375
MSRP
$150
$49-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-18%
$49
Performance per Dollar
25.2+21%
20.9
Codename
Thames
Venus
Release
January 7 2013
2015
Ranking
#883
#877