Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 M260X

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 M260X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M260X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 7.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$139 MSRP

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

  • 3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M260X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,013 vs 1,009), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7690M XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M260X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.3% (7.3 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7690M XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7690M XT scores 1,009 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score
1,009
1,013
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS+27%
0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
48 KB
96 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7690M XT has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7690M XT and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
DirectX
11.2
12 (11_1)+7%
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3.0.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
Encoder
UVD 3
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7690M XT draws 25W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
TDP
25W-67%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
40.4+199%
13.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7690M XT came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M260X was 7.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon R7 M260X offers 9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7690M XTRadeon R7 M260X
MSRP
$150
$139-7%
Performance per Dollar
6.7
7.3+9%
Codename
Thames
Opal
Release
January 7 2013
December 6 2015
Ranking
#883
#878

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.