Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000M

2012Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7690M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 120% higher power demand at 55W vs 25W.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013

Why buy it

  • 0.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 55W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7690M XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,009 vs 1,004), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7690M XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7690M XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000M

The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000M scores 1,004 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7690M XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Raw compute: 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT).

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
G3D Mark Score
1,004
1,009
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5722 TFLOPS
0.696 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
48 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7690M XT.

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (11_0) (Quadro K2000M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
DirectX
11.1 (11_0)
11.2
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Quadro K2000M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 3.

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
Encoder
NVENC
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 7690M XT's 25W — a 75% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
TDP
55W
25W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
18.3
40.4+121%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7690M XT (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K2000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK107
Thames
Release
June 1 2012
January 7 2013
Ranking
#886
#883

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.