Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Quadro K2000M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2000M is positioned at rank 58 and the Radeon HD 8600/8700M is on rank 390, so the Quadro K2000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8600/8700M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8600/8700M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000M and Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Quadro K2000M
The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,030 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000M scores 1,004 and the Radeon HD 8600/8700M reaches 1,030 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Raw compute: 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8600/8700M).
| Feature | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,004 | 1,030+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5722 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+73% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M has 512 MB. The Quadro K2000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 8600/8700M's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.3 | 20.6+13% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.5 (Quadro K2000M) vs 34.3 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) — the Radeon HD 8600/8700M offers 2.4% better value. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 8600/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.5 | 34.3+2% |
| Codename | GK107 | Venus |
| Release | June 1 2012 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #886 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000M and Radeon HD 8600/8700M
