Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅104.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 104.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2000M instead at 1,004 vs 1,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000M

The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000M scores 1,004 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	1,004	1,000
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. Quadro K2000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (11_0) (Quadro K2000M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12_0+8%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Quadro K2000M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder	NVENC	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP	55W	30W-45%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.3	33.3+82%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K2000M	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GK107	Kaveri Spectre
Release	June 1 2012	January 14 2014
Ranking	#886	#865

Search Quadro K2000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.