G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
308.2% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 303.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M4150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,011 vs 1,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 303.7% (20.4 vs 5.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	1,011+1%	1,000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. FirePro M4150 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	33.3+397%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4150 came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 75.5% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (FirePro M4150) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 300% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP	$200	$49-76%
Performance per Dollar	5.1	20.4+300%
Codename	Opal	Kaveri Spectre
Release	October 16 2013	January 14 2014
Ranking	#879	#865

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.