Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 M270DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 M270DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 M270DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M270DX across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
49% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M270DX

2014

Why buy it

✅11.9% more average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M270DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 14 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A265 instead at 994 vs 962, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A265 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M270DX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.2% (9.6 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M270DX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 A265 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 M270DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

Radeon R7 M270DX

The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A265 scores 994 and the Radeon R7 M270DX reaches 962 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A265 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M270DX uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 940 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R7 M270DX
G3D Mark Score	994+3%	962
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6336 TFLOPS	0.7219 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	825 MHz	940 MHz+14%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R7 M270DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270DX.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R7 M270DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A265 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M270DX's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A265) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R7 M270DX
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	33.1+159%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A265 came in at $149, while the Radeon R7 M270DX launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M270DX was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) vs 9.6 (Radeon R7 M270DX) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 43.3% better value.

Feature	Radeon R7 A265	Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP	$149	$100-33%
Performance per Dollar	6.7	9.6+43%
Codename	Opal	Topaz
Release	January 9 2014	June 11 2014
Ranking	#890	#897

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M270DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.