CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 M270DX
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M270DX is positioned at rank 372 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is on rank 85, so the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270DX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M270DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M270DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M270DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $49), it costs 59% less, resulting in a 135.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 M270DX
The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M270DX scores 962 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M270DX is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 962 | 1,000+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M270DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.8 | 33.3+160% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M270DX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Radeon R7 M270DX costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.1 (Radeon R7 M270DX) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 135.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-59% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.1+136% | 20.4 |
| Codename | Topaz | Kaveri Spectre |
| Release | June 11 2014 | January 14 2014 |
| Ranking | #897 | #865 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
