Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 M465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M350

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

✅5.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$120 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M350 instead at 1,066 vs 1,059, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 M350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.8% (10.7 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M465 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M350

The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M350 scores 1,066 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M350 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M350) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.7795 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M350) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M350	Radeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score	1,066	1,059
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7795 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock	825 MHz	1125 MHz+36%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M350	Radeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M350 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465.

Feature	Radeon R7 M350	Radeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M350 draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M350) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 M350	Radeon R7 M465
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	30.5+116%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M350 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M350 was 16.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (Radeon R7 M350) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon R7 M350 offers 21.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R7 M350	Radeon R7 M465
MSRP	$100-17%	$120
Performance per Dollar	10.7+22%	8.8
Codename	Meso	Topaz
Release	May 5 2015	May 15 2016
Ranking	#862	#867

Search Radeon R7 M350 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.