Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

✅17.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌442.9% higher power demand at 190W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 190W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 285 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (6,680 vs 6,421), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon R9 285 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 285 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 285 scores 6,680 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,680+4%	6,421
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.29 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+12%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	448 KB+75%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 285 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 175% advantage for the Radeon R9 285. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Radeon RX 6300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	176 GB/s+175%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+700%	32-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12.0	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.4	4.6+5%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	VCE 3.0	—
Decoder	UVD 5.0	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 285 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 137.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
TDP	190W	35W-82%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	221mm	—
Height	109mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-7%	70°C
Perf/Watt	35.2	183.5+421%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R9 285	Radeon RX 6300M
MSRP	$249	—
Codename	Tonga	Navi 24
Release	September 2 2014	January 4 2022
Ranking	#365	#379

Search Radeon R9 285 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.