Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon R9 285
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 285 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 285 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 285 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 285 scores 6,680 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,680+2% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.29 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+17% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 285 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 285 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 16.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s+16% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 285 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 62.1% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 221mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 100W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 221mm | 1mm |
| Height | 109mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.2 | 65.5+86% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 285 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 167.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 167.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tonga | Polaris 22 |
| Release | September 2 2014 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #365 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 285 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
