Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 61.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 295X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-61.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+61.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (307mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $200 for the Radeon R9 295X2, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 169.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+169.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 61.6%. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734 | 14,114+62% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2+47% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.451 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1680 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2+47% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 1.9 MB+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 295X2 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Radeon R9 295X2 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 853% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Bus width: 512-bit x2 vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s x2 | 336 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+167% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 103% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 307mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 72.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 160W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 307mm | 229mm |
| Height | 114mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-10% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 88.2+404% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 40% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.7 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 169.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $349-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $120-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.7 | 117.6+169% |
| Codename | Vesuvius | TU106 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #303 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce RTX 2060
