
Radeon R9 295X2

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅68.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌737.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 500W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,320 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 747.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 500W, a 390W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734 | 8,837+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2+100% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2+10% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1845 MHz+81% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2+100% | 88 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 295X2 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 295X2 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 1329.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Memory bus width is 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 5500.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s x2+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+300% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 127.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 307mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 110W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 450W-55% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 307mm | 180mm |
| Height | 114mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 80.3+359% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 295X2 came in at $1499, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5500 was 88.1% cheaper ($1320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 751.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5500 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $179-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 49.4+752% |
| Codename | Vesuvius | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #303 | #297 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















