
Radeon R9 295X2

Radeon RX 480
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 480 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅4.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌554.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 500W vs 150W.
- ❌27.9% longer card at 307mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 540.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 500W, a 350W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 307mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734+2% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2+22% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.834 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1266 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2+22% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+22% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 1150.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Memory bus width is 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 480. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s x2+25% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 307mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 150W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 307mm | 240mm |
| Height | 114mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 57.0+226% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 295X2 came in at $1499, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 480 was 84.7% cheaper ($1270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 543.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 480 (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $229-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 37.3+543% |
| Codename | Vesuvius | Ellesmere |
| Release | April 29 2014 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #303 | #305 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















