G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 531.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 500W, a 450W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 307mm, a 139mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅61.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
554.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 500W vs 50W.
❌82.7% longer card at 307mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 295X2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 61.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (8,734 vs 8,428), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,270 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 531.7% (36.8 vs 5.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 295X2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Radeon R9 295X2

The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1018 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
G3D Mark Score	8,428	8,734+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2816 ×2+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.58 TFLOPS	5.733 TFLOPS ×2+60%
Boost Clock	2331 MHz+129%	1018 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	48	176 ×2+267%
L1 Cache	256 KB	704 KB+175%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit	512-bit x2+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	2	6+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 307mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
TDP	50W-90%	500W
Recommended PSU	500W-50%	1000W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	168mm	307mm
Height	69mm	114mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	65°C-7%
Perf/Watt	168.6+863%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6400 was 84.7% cheaper ($1270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 534.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon R9 295X2
MSRP	$229-85%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	36.8+534%	5.8
Codename	Navi 24	Vesuvius
Release	January 19 2022	April 29 2014
Ranking	#308	#303

Search Radeon PRO W6400 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 295X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.