
Radeon PRO W6400

Radeon RX 580
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 185W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅59.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌270% higher power demand at 185W vs 50W.
- ❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,428 | 8,799+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.58 TFLOPS | 6.175 TFLOPS+72% |
| Boost Clock | 2331 MHz+74% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 576 KB+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6400 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 580 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 580. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 114.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.6+254% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 4.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 38.4+4% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #308 | #301 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














