Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 5500

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5500

2019Boost: 1845 MHz
RX family
·······

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 5500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • 4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 180mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 27.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $229 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon RX 5500

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 5500 instead at 8,837 vs 8,428, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.1% (49.4 vs 36.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 5500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W6400 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5500

The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1845 MHz.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
G3D Mark Score
8,428
8,837+5%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
768
1408+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.58 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock
2331 MHz+26%
1845 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
88+83%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6400 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 5500.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 75% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 180mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
TDP
50W-55%
110W
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
168mm
180mm
Height
69mm
110mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
168.6+110%
80.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5500 was 21.8% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 34.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 5500
MSRP
$229
$179-22%
Performance per Dollar
36.8
49.4+34%
Codename
Navi 24
Navi 14
Release
January 19 2022
October 7 2019
Ranking
#308
#297

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.