Radeon PRO W6400 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 510 MHzBoost: 1215 MHz
Similar parts
·····

Radeon PRO W6400 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

  • 75.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (8,485 vs 8,428), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RTX A4500 Embedded GPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 184.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
8,428
8,485
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
768
5888+667%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.58 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS+300%
Boost Clock
2331 MHz+92%
1215 MHz
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
48
184+283%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
5.8 MB+2220%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores
12
46+283%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 128-bit on the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Encoder
VCN 3.0
NVENC 8.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
PureVideo HD VP11
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
TDP
50W-38%
80W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
168.6+59%
106.1