G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX590 GME FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX590 GME: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 175W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
32.4% HIGHER MSRP
$229 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).

Radeon RX590 GME

2018

Why buy it

✅66.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌250% higher power demand at 175W vs 50W.
❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX590 GME is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 66.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6400 instead at 8,428 vs 8,349, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX590 GME makes the most sense to buy today. It is $56 cheaper on MSRP at $173 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.1% (48.3 vs 36.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX590 GME is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W6400 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX590 GME Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Radeon RX590 GME

The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
G3D Mark Score	8,428	8,349
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	768	2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.58 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS+99%
Boost Clock	2331 MHz+51%	1545 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	144+200%
L1 Cache	256 KB	576 KB+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME carries 8 GB. Radeon RX590 GME gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX590 GME. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
TDP	50W-71%	175W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	168mm	241mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	168.6+253%	47.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. On MSRP, Radeon RX590 GME was 24.5% cheaper ($56 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 31.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2018).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6400	Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP	$229	$173-24%
Performance per Dollar	36.8	48.3+31%
Codename	Navi 24	Polaris 30
Release	January 19 2022	November 15 2018
Ranking	#308	#285

Search Radeon PRO W6400 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX590 GME on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.