G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon PRO W6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon PRO W6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Duo

2016

Why buy it

✅68.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
554.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌600% higher power demand at 350W vs 50W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 564.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 350W, a 300W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro Duo is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6400 instead at 8,428 vs 8,299, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,270 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 564.8% (36.8 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro Duo still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon PRO W6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Duo

The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2331 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	8,299	8,428+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096 ×2+433%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.192 TFLOPS ×2+129%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	2331 MHz+133%
ROPs	64 ×2+100%	32
TMUs	256 ×2+433%	48
L1 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro Duo gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Duo and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	VCE 3.4	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 150% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	350W	50W-86%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	23.7	168.6+611%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Duo came in at $1499, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6400 was 84.7% cheaper ($1270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 569.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro Duo	Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP	$1499	$229-85%
Performance per Dollar	5.5	36.8+569%
Codename	Capsaicin	Navi 24
Release	April 26 2016	January 19 2022
Ranking	#309	#308

Search Radeon Pro Duo on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.