CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo

CMP 40HX

2021Core: 1470 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Duo

2016Boost: 1000 MHz

CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 40HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 126.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 185W instead of 350W, a 165W reduction.
  • Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro Duo

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 114.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 89.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 185W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
CMP 40HX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.4% in PassMark G3D (8,749 vs 8,299), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 40HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm, 36 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 126.1% (12.5 vs 5.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 40HX

The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon Pro Duo

The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 8,299 — the CMP 40HX leads by 5.4%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
G3D Mark Score
8,749+5%
8,299
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
4096 ×2+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.603 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS ×2+8%
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+65%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64
64 ×2
TMUs
144
256 ×2+78%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+130%
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro Duo gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Duo. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.0
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
Encoder
No
VCE 3.4
Decoder
No
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 61.7% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
TDP
185W-47%
350W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
47.3+100%
23.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. On MSRP, CMP 40HX was 53.4% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the CMP 40HX offers 127.3% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon Pro Duo
MSRP
$699-53%
$1499
Performance per Dollar
12.5+127%
5.5
Codename
TU106
Capsaicin
Release
February 25 2021
April 26 2016
Ranking
#302
#309

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.