
CMP 40HX

Radeon Pro Duo
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 350W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌114.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌89.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 185W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 40HX vs Radeon Pro Duo Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 8,299 — the CMP 40HX leads by 5.4%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+5% | 8,299 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096 ×2+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+65% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256 ×2+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+130% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro Duo gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Duo. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 61.7% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-47% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3+100% | 23.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. On MSRP, CMP 40HX was 53.4% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the CMP 40HX offers 127.3% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-53% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+127% | 5.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | Capsaicin |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #302 | #309 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















