Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon RX590 GME
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro Duo is positioned at rank #200 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Duo
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX590 GME
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX590 GME uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX590 GME likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Duo lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX590 GME is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Duo.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX590 GME offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $115 versus $799 for the Radeon Pro Duo, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 599% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+599%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($799) | ✅More affordable ($115) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon RX590 GME
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,349 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+15% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1545 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+78% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+79% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX590 GME is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 175W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 47.7+101% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $799, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173 and now averages $115. The Radeon RX590 GME costs 85.6% less ($684 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 72.6 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 598.1% better value. The Radeon RX590 GME is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $173-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $799 | $115-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 72.6+598% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | Polaris 30 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #309 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon RX590 GME
