CPU
GPU
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3200 is positioned at rank 86 and the Radeon Pro Duo is on rank 200, so the Quadro P3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Duo
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Duo lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro Duo offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $799 for the Radeon Pro Duo, it costs 92% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1210.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1210.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($63) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro Duo
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon Pro Duo reaches 8,299 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578+3% | 8,299 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096 ×2+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz+54% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 112 | 256 ×2+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.66 MB | 1 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 129.4% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-79% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+383% | 23.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $63, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 and now averages $799. The Quadro P3200 costs 92.1% less ($736 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 10.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the Quadro P3200 offers 1209.6% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-67% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63-92% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.2+1210% | 10.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Capsaicin |
| Release | February 21 2018 | April 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #304 | #309 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro Duo
