Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 480

2016

Why buy it

  • 54.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
  • 42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (8,546 vs 8,428), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $229 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.4% (37.3 vs 36.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W6400 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 480

The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
G3D Mark Score
8,428
8,546+1%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.58 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS+63%
Boost Clock
2331 MHz+84%
1266 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
144+200%
L1 Cache
256 KB
576 KB+125%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 480 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 480. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
VCN 3.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
168mm
240mm
Height
69mm
95mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
168.6+196%
57.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 1.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400Radeon RX 480
MSRP
$229
$229
Performance per Dollar
36.8
37.3+1%
Codename
Navi 24
Ellesmere
Release
January 19 2022
June 29 2016
Ranking
#308
#305

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.