
Radeon PRO W6400

Radeon RX 480
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅54.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6400 vs Radeon RX 480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,428 | 8,546+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.58 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2331 MHz+84% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 576 KB+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 480 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 480. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.6+196% | 57.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W6400 came in at $229, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 1.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 37.3+1% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 19 2022 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #308 | #305 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














