GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Radeon PRO W6400
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon PRO W6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon PRO W6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon PRO W6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1209.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Radeon PRO W6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1152.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon PRO W6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 2331 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811+5% | 8,428 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+650% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2+41% | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 2331 MHz+166% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+400% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 256 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 50W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 168.6+617% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6400 was 92.4% cheaper ($2770 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 1169% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $229-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 36.8+1169% |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #300 | #308 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon PRO W6400
