GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon PRO W6400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

95%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

90%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

84%

#18

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

401%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

83%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

83%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

82%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

81%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

100%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

87%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

80%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon PRO W6400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon PRO W6400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.

Insight	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+200%)	🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon PRO W6400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $400 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 91.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+91.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400)	✅More affordable ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 2331 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	8,811+5%	8,428
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	5760 ×2+650%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.046 TFLOPS ×2+41%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	876 MHz	2331 MHz+166%
ROPs	48 ×2+50%	32
TMUs	240 ×2+400%	48
L1 Cache	240 KB	256 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit x2+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.0	1.2+20%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	375W	50W-87%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	23.5	168.6+617%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 and now averages $200. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 50% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 42.1 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 91.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).