Radeon R9 295X2
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌525% higher power demand at 500W vs 80W.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅8.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 500W, a 420W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734+3% | 8,485 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2 | 5888+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 | 14.31 TFLOPS+150% |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1215 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 176 ×2 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 5.8 MB+741% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 295X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 295X2 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2 and 128-bit on the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 144.8% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 307mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 80W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 307mm | 0mm |
| Height | 114mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 106.1+506% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A4500 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Codename | Vesuvius | GA104 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #303 | #307 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 295X2 and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
