Radeon R9 295X2 vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 295X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (307mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 295X2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 295X2 and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734+3% | 8,485 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2 | 5888+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 | 14.31 TFLOPS+150% |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1215 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 176 ×2 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 5.8 MB+741% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 295X2 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 295X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 144.8% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 307mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 80W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 307mm | 0mm |
| Height | 114mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 106.1+506% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | — |
| Codename | Vesuvius | GA104 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #303 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 295X2 and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
