Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Radeon Pro W5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 295X2.
| Insight | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (307mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 295X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5500, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 47% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the Radeon Pro W5500 reaches 8,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734 | 8,913+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2+100% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2+45% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1400 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2+100% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 512-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 307mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 125W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 307mm | 241mm |
| Height | 114mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 71.3+307% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 and now averages $300. The Radeon R9 295X2 costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.7 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 29.7 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon R9 295X2 offers 47.1% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $399-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-33% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.7+47% | 29.7 |
| Codename | Vesuvius | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #303 | #294 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon Pro W5500
