CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 350
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $50 for the Radeon R9 350, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 233.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+233.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 350 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Radeon R9 350
The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 350 scores 1,998 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 350 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 350) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,998 | 2,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+3900% | 64 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 350 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 350 draws 300W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 184.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R9 350) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 12W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 166.7+2388% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 350 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 233.3% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 350 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.0 | 133.3+233% |
| Codename | Grenada | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #296 | #672 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 350 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
