Radeon R9 350 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 SE.

Insight	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 350 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 350 and GeForce GTX 460 SE

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 350 scores 1,998 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 350 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 350) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,998	1,988
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2560+789%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.12 TFLOPS+584%	0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+233%	48
L1 Cache	640 KB+67%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
DirectX	12_0	12.0
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo VP4.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Encoder	VCE 1.0	UVD 4.0
Decoder	UVD 3.1	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 350 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R9 350) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP	300W	150W-50%
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	2x 6-pin
Length	168mm	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	6.7	13.3+99%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 350 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 0.5% better value. The Radeon R9 350 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).