Radeon R9 350 vs Radeon R9 M385X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 350 vs Radeon R9 M385X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 350 vs Radeon R9 M385X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅59.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 203.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
203% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 59.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,998 vs 1,994), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 203.6% (20.2 vs 6.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R9 350 vs Radeon R9 M385X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 350 scores 1,998 and the Radeon R9 M385X reaches 1,994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 350 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 350) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	1,998	1,994
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.12 TFLOPS+160%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1100 MHz+10%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+186%	56
L1 Cache	640 KB+186%	224 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX	12_0	12 (12_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3.1	UVD 4.2
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 350 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R9 350) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	6.7	26.6+297%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 350 came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 350 was 67% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 206.1% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP	$99-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	20.2+206%	6.6
Codename	Grenada	Strato
Release	June 18 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#296	#681

Search Radeon R9 350 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M385X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.