Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 350

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 350

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 350 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,026 vs 1,998), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 49.4% (20.2 vs 13.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Iris Pro Graphics P580 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score
2,026+1%
1,998
Architecture
Generation 9.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
576
2560+344%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.21 TFLOPS
5.12 TFLOPS+323%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+5%
1000 MHz
ROPs
9
64+611%
TMUs
72
160+122%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 181% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon R9 350
TDP
15W-95%
300W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
135.1+1916%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 came in at $150, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 350 was 34% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 49.6% better value.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics P580Radeon R9 350
MSRP
$150
$99-34%
Performance per Dollar
13.5
20.2+50%
Codename
Skylake GT4e
Grenada
Release
September 1 2015
June 18 2015
Ranking
#678
#296

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.