
FirePro V7800

Radeon R9 350
FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7800
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌666.7% HIGHER MSRP$759 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌51.2% longer card at 254mm vs 168mm.
Radeon R9 350
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $660 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 655.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 254mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Radeon R9 350
The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028+2% | 1,998 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 5.12 TFLOPS+176% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 640 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. FirePro V7800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7800) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro V7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 254mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+101% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7800 came in at $759, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 350 was 87% cheaper ($660 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro V7800) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 648.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 350 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $99-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 20.2+648% |
| Codename | Cayman | Grenada |
| Release | May 24 2011 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















