Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon R9 350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 300W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Xe Graphics MAX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 350 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
80% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
❌1100% higher power demand at 300W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,998 vs 1,972), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Xe Graphics MAX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $44 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77.7% (35.9 vs 20.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 350 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score	1,972	1,998+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.1	GCN 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.534 TFLOPS	5.12 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock	1650 MHz+65%	1000 MHz
ROPs	24	64+167%
TMUs	48	160+233%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics MAX and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
DirectX	12.1	12_0
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 1.0
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 169.2% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
TDP	25W-92%	300W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	78.9+1078%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics MAX came in at $55, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics MAX was 44.4% cheaper ($44 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers 77.7% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics MAX (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics MAX	Radeon R9 350
MSRP	$55-44%	$99
Performance per Dollar	35.9+78%	20.2
Codename	DG1	Grenada
Release	October 31 2020	June 18 2015
Ranking	#685	#296

Search Iris Xe Graphics MAX on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.