Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Quadro 5000
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Iris Xe Graphics MAX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $100 for the Quadro 5000, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 151.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Quadro 5000
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 1,963 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+118% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+251% | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 40+67% |
| TMUs | 48+9% | 44 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 has 3 GB. The Quadro 5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 143.5% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+512% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $100. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 19.6 (Quadro 5000) — the Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers 151.5% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-98% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3+152% | 19.6 |
| Codename | DG1 | GF100 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #685 | #687 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Quadro 5000
