Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $40 for the Iris Xe Graphics MAX, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 170.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+170.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the Iris Xe Graphics MAX reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000+1% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 768+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1650 MHz+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Decoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 70.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-52% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+111% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 170.4% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $55 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+170% | 49.3 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | DG1 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #672 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
