Radeon R9 350 vs GeForce GTX 670MX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX

#101

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

274%

#103

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

249%

#104

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

248%

#108

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

226%

#109

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

224%

#111

GeForce GTX 670MX

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

99%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

97%

#117

GeForce MX570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $120

97%

#118

Radeon RX 6500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

97%

#119

GeForce 825M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

96%

#121

Radeon HD 6970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48

96%

#123

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#126

GeForce GT 550M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 670MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 350 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 670MX Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 350 and GeForce GTX 670MX

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce GTX 670MX

The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 350 scores 1,998 and the GeForce GTX 670MX reaches 1,978 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 350 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 670MX uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 350) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350) vs 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX).

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
G3D Mark Score	1,998+1%	1,978
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+167%	960
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.12 TFLOPS+344%	1.154 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+167%	24
TMUs	160+100%	80
L1 Cache	640 KB+700%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 350 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670MX has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670MX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 670MX) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 350) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD VP5.

Feature	Radeon R9 350	GeForce GTX 670MX
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	UVD 3.1	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	—	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 350 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 670MX's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 670MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R9 350) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.